Skip Navigation


NDT Plus Advance Access originally published online on June 30, 2008
NDT Plus 2008 1(5):377; doi:10.1093/ndtplus/sfn096
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1/5/377    most recent
sfn096v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xydakis, D.
Right arrow Articles by Sfyridakh, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2008]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The effect of angiotensin type 1 receptor blockade on adhesion molecules in patients with IgA nephropathy

Dimitris Xydakis1, Apostolos Papadogiannakis1, Maria Sfakianaki1, Konstantinos Kostakis1 and Aikaterinh Sfyridakh2

1 Nephrology Department
2 Regional Blood Bank Center Venizeleio Hospital Heraklio Crete, Greece

Correspondence: E-mail: dxydakis{at}gmail.com

Sir,

Various studies have linked inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in patients with chronic renal disease [1]. Plasma levels of adhesion molecules [soluble intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM) and soluble vascular adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM)] are markers of endothelial dysfunction and also risk factors for cardiovascular disease in patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN) [2]. It is known that vascular lesion begins long before its clinical manifestation and its pathogenesis involves endothelial dysfunction and low-grade inflammation. Numerous studies provide evidence that ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor antagonists (ARBs) are more effective than other antihypertensive drugs in slowing the progressive decline in glomerular filtration rate in IgAN [3]. Our aim was to test whether blocking the renin–angiotensin system (RAS) with irbesartan decreases levels of adhesion molecules in patients with biopsy-proven IgAN.

We included in our study 36 patients (M/F 26/10, 51 ± 12.5 years). The inclusion criteria were biopsy-proven IgAN (defined by standard morphologic and immunohistochemical criteria), serum creatinine ≤1.5 mg/dl and urinary protein excretion ≥500 mg/day in at least three consecutive determinations during the previous 6-month period. Exclusion criteria were diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, stroke, acute infection or the inflammatory process on course and marked hypercholesterolaemia. Blood samples were collected from all patients before (T0) and after 16 weeks (T1) of treatment with 300 mg of irbesartan given once daily in the morning. A thorough blood chemistry control was performed in all patients. Creatinine clearance was determined by using venous blood for serum levels of creatinine and a 24-h urine collection. Serum and urinary creatinine concentration was measured using the Jaffé method. Serum intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 were measured by immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 13.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).

Systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was significantly lower after irbesartan was given (from SBP T0: 144 ± 19 mmHg DBP T0: 93 ± 9 mmHg to SBP T1: 129 ± 9 mmHg DBP T1: 88 ± 8 mmHg, P < 0.01). Proteinuria levels were also significantly lower after treatment: from 1.6 ± 0.7 g/24 h – T0 to 1.1 ± 0.9 g/24 h – T1 (P < 0.001). We observed a significant decrease of sICAM and sVCAM plasma levels in patients after treatment with irbesartan (sICAM T0: 628 ± 163 ng/ml to sICAM T1: 369 ± 112 ng/ml, P < 0.001; sVCAM T0: 1028 ± 649 ng/ml to sVCAM T1: 688 ± 248 ng/ml, P < 0.001) (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Summary of before (T0) and (T1) the treatment in each parameter (BP, sICAM and sVCAM)

 
Studies [2,4] have proven the important role of inflammation in the outcome of IgAN. Angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist significantly decreases proteinuria and slows renal deterioration in patients with IgAN. Our data suggest that treatment with irbesartan in patients with IgAN has a beneficial effect on inflammatory markers. The interfering with the inflammatory markers of AT1 antagonist could, at least partially, explain the effect of AT1 receptor blockade on renal survival in patients with IgAN. It is obvious that additional studies are needed to verify this hypothesis, especially in order to rule out the direct effect of lowering blood pressure on the inflammatory markers taken into consideration.

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.


    References
 Top
 References
 

  1. Landray MJ, Wheeler DC, Lip GY, et al. Inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and platelet activation in patients with chronic kidney disease: the chronic renal impairment in Birmingham (CRIB) study. Am J Kidney Dis (2004) 43:244–253.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  2. Nelson C, Karschimkus C, Dragicevic G, et al. Systemic and vascular inflammation is elevated in early IgA and type 1 diabetic nephropathies and relates to vascular disease risk factors and renal function. Nephrol Dial Transplant (2005) 20:2420–2426.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Li PK, Leung CB, Chow KM, et al. Hong Kong study using valsartan in IgA nephropathy (HKVIN): a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Am J Kidney Dis (2006) 47:751–760.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Kaartinen K, Syrjänen J, Pörsti I, et al. Inflammatory markers and the pr- ogression of IgA glomerulonephritis. Nephrol Dial Transplant (2008) 23((4)):1285–1290.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1/5/377    most recent
sfn096v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xydakis, D.
Right arrow Articles by Sfyridakh, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?