Skip Navigation


NDT Plus Advance Access originally published online on December 11, 2007
NDT Plus 2008 1(1):55; doi:10.1093/ndtplus/sfm002
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1/1/55    most recent
sfm002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barraclough, K.
Right arrow Articles by Yeung, C. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2007]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Lipomatosis and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: causation, association or coincidence?

Katherine Barraclough1 and Choi Kit Yeung1

1 Department of Nephrology Vancouver General Hospital Vancouver, Canada

Correspondence: E-mail: arbieb{at}hotmail.com

Sir,

Lipomatosis is an extremely rare disorder [1]. Affected persons develop multiple symmetrical, diffuse deposits of fat in the subcutaneous tissue. The lipomata cause physical disfigurement, without tendency to malignancy [1].

Little is known about secondary co-morbidity, with no previous reports of associated renal disease. We describe three patients with lipomatosis who developed biopsy-proven focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS).

A 41-year-old man with lipomatosis since age 18 was incidentally found to have proteinuria (1.36 g/day). Blood pressure and lipid levels were normal. Serum creatinine was 132 mmol/l. Renal biopsy showed FSGS. Prednisone and ramipril led to mild proteinuria reduction. After 110 months, creatinine was 154 mmol/l and proteinuria was 1.92 g/day.

Patient 2 developed proteinuria and anasarca at age 7. These rapidly resolved with prednisone and diuretics. There was no follow-up. Lipomatosis appeared at 25. Urinalysis and blood pressure at 32 were normal. Asymptomatic proteinuria (0.79 g/day) was again noted at 34. Blood pressure, kidney function and albumin remained normal. Renal biopsy showed FSGS. Enalapril led to modest proteinuria reduction. After 134 months, creatinine was 190 mmol/l with proteinuria of 0.79 g/day.

The third patient also had undiagnosed childhood renal disease, with peripheral oedema and proteinuria. Symptoms and proteinuria were resolved with herbs. Lipomatosis became apparent at 20. Asymptomatic proteinuria (2.2 g/day) was again noted at 37. Blood pressure was 120/80, serum creatinine was 136 mmol/l and albumin was normal. Renal biopsy showed FSGS. There was minimal response to prednisone, but with subsequent ramipril, proteinuria fell to 0.53 g/day. After 86 months, creatinine had risen to 280 mmol/l with proteinuria of 2.94 g/day.

The slow deterioration in all patients occurred despite ACE inhibitor therapy and optimal blood pressure and lipid control.

FSGS is a common renal diagnosis, with non-specific histological findings. Of interest here is the unifying association with lipomatosis. FSGS can be primary or secondary. Clinical and biopsy features usually allow distinction. In our patients, the lack of symptoms, degree of proteinuria, electron microscopic findings and slow progression suggested secondary disease.

In patient 1, we were unable to identify any coexisting disorders associated with secondary FSGS. The other two patients had undiagnosed childhood renal disease, which, despite apparent resolution with therapy, may have been predisposing. Regardless, the rarity of lipomatosis makes the chance of finding the same renal lesion in the three patients less likely. Further, the same renal lesion occurs in obesity, a condition also associated with adipocyte excess. The mechanism underlying this association remains unclear, but the effects of adipocyte-derived hormones on glomerular structure and function have been suggested, with leptin, TNF-{alpha} and angiotensin II being identified as potential mediators [2,3].

We suggest a possible link between adipocyte tumour cell hormone production and the development and/or progression of FSGS in our patients. Increased reporting of similar cases is needed to confirm this association.

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.


    References
 Top
 References
 

  1. Harsch IA, Schahin SP, Fuchs FS, et al. Insulin resistance, hyperleptinemia, and obstructive sleep apnea in Launois–Bensaude syndrome. Obes Res (2002) 10:625–632.[Web of Science][Medline]
  2. Wolf G. After all those fat years: renal consequences of obesity. Nephrol Dial Transplant (2003) 18:2471–2474.[Free Full Text]
  3. Weicek A, Kokot F, Chuduk J, et al. The adipose tissue—a novel endocrine organ of interest to the nephrologist. Nephrol Dial Transplant (2002) 17:191–195.[Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1/1/55    most recent
sfm002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barraclough, K.
Right arrow Articles by Yeung, C. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?