Skip Navigation

NDT Plus 2008 1(Supplement 4):iv23-iv28; doi:10.1093/ndtplus/sfn120
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peppelenbosch, A.
Right arrow Articles by Tordoir, J. H. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2008]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

This article appears in the following NDT Plus issue: Dialysis Initiatives May 2007, Berlin, Germany [View the issue table of contents]

Peritoneal dialysis catheter placement technique and complications

Arnoud Peppelenbosch1, Willy H. M. van Kuijk2, Nicole D. Bouvy1, Frank M. van der Sande3 and Jan H. M. Tordoir1

1 Department of Surgery, University Hospital Maastricht
2 Department of Nephrology, VieCuri Hospital Venlo
3 Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands

Correspondence: J. H. M. Tordoir, Department of Surgery, University Hospital Maastricht, P Debijelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Tel: +31-43-3875491; Fax: +31-43-3875743; E-mail: j.tordoir{at}surgery.azm.nl


   Abstract

Background. This review describes the peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter implantation techniques for the treatment of PD. The PD catheter-related complications still cause significant morbidity and mortality, resulting in the necessity to switch to haemodialysis (HD) treatment.

Methods. Several catheter insertion techniques, using an open surgical approach, laparoscopic and percutaneous techniques have been employed, with their specific early and late complications and failure rates.

Results. Despite the similar outcomes of open surgical versus laparoscopic techniques from randomized studies, the laparoscopic insertion has the major advantage of correct catheter positioning in the lower abdomen, with the possibility of adhesiolysis. The minimal invasive percutaneous insertion bears the risk of bowel perforation and catheter malpositioning, and the outcome of this technique is strongly related to the experience of the surgeon. The major complications of these implantation techniques, like bleeding, dialysate leakage and catheter malpositioning, and their management are discussed in our study. Late peritonitis remains the major drawback of PD treatment, with the need of temporary or permanent changeover to the HD treatment in 10% of the patients.

Conclusions. Enrichment of the physician's interest and experience, along with a multidisciplinary approach to outline the optimal strategy of PD-catheter insertion and complication of the treatment, may improve the patients’ survival and decrease the morbidity.

Key Words: peritoneal dialysis • catheter • complications • peritonitis • insertion techniques

Received for publication February 19, 2008. Accepted for publication June 19, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.